07/19/2016

NEXT POST
Attorney General In this modest work, classify the joint litigation as follows below: 1) According to the plurality of subjects as part (Plurisubjetividad) 2) The time 3) According to the source or home base is the position of subjects as part (Plurisubjetividad) active joint litigation: The plurisubjetividad is on the applicant, ie when several plaintiffs against one defendant. passive joint litigation: The plurisubjetividad is on the defendant, we can define without uncertainty that there are multiple defendants, since there is only one actor. Joint joint litigation: The plurisubjetividad occurs in either party, that is, there are several plaintiffs and defendants. 17 For the master Carnelutti "classifies them as" simple and reciprocal, "according to a plurality of players will face a one or more defendants against one actor, or into the second category, they face more of an actor with more than one demand "18 As the time from the moment of its formation is classified: joint litigation originating joint litigation originally referred joint litigation: When the plurality of subjects are from initiating the process. Successive joint litigation: When plurisubjetividad (plurality of subjects) appears after its development. In the same vein, Lino Palacios "classifies joint litigation in originating and thereafter, the former have a plurality materializes in the stage postulatoria the claim of defense, in the latter: the plurality materializes into the process already begun, through third party intervention in its various forms. 19 The doctrine relying on the legislature's intent that the Attorney General agree that the plurisubjetividad originating comes configured with the application, in other words, there will be plurality of subjects from the beginning of the process, but instead : the joint litigation ensued 20 the plurisubjetividad is structured after the demand, in simple terms desenvolmiento occurs during the process. .
PREVIOUS POST
Federal Reserve It looked very good idea.) Financial authorities have a major responsibility for what happened. Basel Standards, theoretically designed to control the system, stimulated the SECURITISATION to extremes can obscure and complicate enormously the markets they are intended to protect. The Boards of Directors of financial institutions involved in this great fiasco, have a great responsibility, because they have not heard anything. And that included the Board of Directors of the Savings Bank of San Quirze Some rating agencies have been incompetent or independent from their clients, which is very serious end of story (for now): the main Central Banks (the European Central Bank, the U.S. Federal Reserve) have been injecting cash in order to enable banks to have money. ** 22.1. A friend of mine asked me: Where does the European Central Bank money? To avoid complicating the explanation of the crisis, I added a new word in this Dictionary: ECB, European Central Bank. There you have the answer to the question. Some experts say yes than no money, but what is missing is confidence. In other words, the liquidity crisis is not a real crisis of trust of others. Meanwhile, sovereign funds, or investment funds created by countries with surplus funds from the accounts, (mainly from oil and gas) as Wallpaper Arab Emirates, Asia, Russia, etc.. are buying stakes in major American banks to bring them out of the jam they have gotten. Of course, follow the story in the monthly updates of this Dictionary. The first update is below: INSURANCE OF DEBT.

Recent Comments