Manifesto Art This item opens field for varied investigations: If the art she will be necessarily on to the new, as to analyze the new according to old parameters? If something will be truily new, will have to cause queerness; that man would obtain to see perspective what he happens in its time, with the distanciamento that the years will only be able to offer to it? On the other hand, the art has its paper of influence in the human development, accumulating of stocks those that can practise it without the concern to bring a necessarily unknown contribution for the humanity. The author seems to question, in this manner, the paper of the art critic. A formador of opinion? Who needs it? Its opinion is always exempt? Having it preferences, would not be supervaluing them or subestimando the opposite? By chance this man would not be limited what he knows? Would exist a critic of art capable to catch all and to give an opinion that took in account the intentions of the artist? These questions, difficult of if answering and citizens to the intense controversy, seem enough to question the validity of the competitions of art and of the concepts that permeiam the mind of the chosen ones for the paper of judges (18). Professionals who dirigem its analyses with intention to get personal profit are being considered. The citation ' ' ethics initiatives culturais' ' it suggests the promotion of the individual and the society, without preferences and preconceptions. In the time of Mozart, Salieri gained a prize of better composer of the time, makes a mistake that the time if charged to question and to review. The Manifesto is categorical when affirming that no man brings in itself capacities enough to judge, as or better worse, an artistic...

Recent Comments